On Welfare Queens

Exposing hypocrisy is always so much fun.  And there is so much of it around these days to expose to the bright light of day.  With so many relatively easy targets on  which to focus it becomes difficult to pick one from the many, especially one that few folks think about.

For example, who really benefits from government spending?  If you listen to Rush Limbaugh, you might think it was those blue states, packed with damn hippie socialist liberals, sipping their lattes and providing free abortions for bored, horny teenagers.

So let us shine light on the red-states-as takers paradox: Dominated by Republican voters who profess their distaste for the federal government and its social programs, these are the very states most dependent on federal largess.

As it turns out, it is red states that are overwhelmingly the Welfare Queen States. Yes, that’s right. Red States—the ones governed by folks who think government is too big and spending needs to be cut—are a net drain on the economy, taking in more federal spending than they pay out in federal taxes. They talk a good game, but stick Blue States with the bill.

An analysis recently completed by Wallet Hub essentially asked how much each state receives back as a return on its federal income-tax investment. They compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia on three metrics: 1) federal spending per capita compared with every dollar paid in federal income taxes; 2) the percentage of a state’s annual revenue that comes from federal funding; and 3) the number of federal employees per capita. The third measure received only half the weight of each of the others in the calculation.

It can be seen here: https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-least-dependent-on-the-federal-government/2700/

The analysis revealed hat the most “dependent states,” as measured by the composite score, are Mississippi and New Mexico, each of which gets back about $3 in federal spending for every dollar they send to the federal treasury in taxes. Alabama and Louisiana are close behind.

If you look only at the first measure—how much the federal government spends per person in each state compared with the amount its citizens pay in federal income taxes—other states stand out, particularly South Carolina: The Palmetto State receives $7.87 back from Washington for every $1 its citizens pay in federal tax.

On the other side of this group, folks in 14 states, including Delaware, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska, and Ohio, get back less than $1 for each $1 they spend in taxes.

It’s not just that some states are getting way more in return for their federal tax dollars, but the disproportionate amount of federal aid that some states receive allows them to keep their own taxes artificially low.  We have no state income tax here in Florida.

“Part of the explanation for why southern states dominate the “most dependent” category is historical. During the many decades in the 20th century when the South was solidly Democratic, its congressional representatives in both the House and the Senate, enjoying great seniority, came to hold leadership positions on powerful committees, which they used to send federal dollars back to their home states in the form of contracts, projects, installations.”

Another part of the explanation is easier to discern. The reddest states at the top—Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, New Mexico, Maine—have exceptionally high poverty rates and thus receive disproportionately large shares of federal dollars. Through a variety of social programs, the federal government disburses hundreds of billions of dollars each year to maintain a “safety net” intended to help the neediest among us.  The greatest percentage of food stamp/SNAP beneficiaries and those living below the federal poverty level  are in those same red states.

“Because of federal programs, people in places like South Carolina and Mississippi are getting a helping hand not from their neighbors a few blocks away or in the next county over, but from residents of Delaware, Minnesota, Illinois, and Nebraska. Whether you like that idea depends, in part, on how you personally reconcile the tension between two long-cherished, core American values—our passion for individualism and our regard for community—and whether you see “community” as encompassing the whole country.”

But it is not the folks in in the “rich” states, who pay for the far-away poor, bitching about government dependecy, welfare queens, food stamps etc.

It is those who are taking federal money collected from far-away taxpayers to provide food for their own and massive funding for their own state budgets as their Senators and Representatives in Washington rail against social programs and high taxes.

That’s hypocrisy.

.

 

About toritto

I was born during year four of the reign of Emperor Tiberius Claudius on the outskirts of the empire in Brooklyn. I married my high school sweetheart, the girl I took to the prom and we were together for forty years until her passing in 2004. We had four kids together and buried two together. I had a successful career in Corporate America (never got rich but made a living) and traveled the world. I am currently retired in the Tampa Bay metro area and live alone. One of my daughters is close by and one within a morning’s drive. They call their pops everyday. I try to write poetry (not very well), and about family. Occasionally I will try a historical piece relating to politics. :-)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to On Welfare Queens

  1. beetleypete says:

    Very interesting figures, Frank. It would be equally interesting to see a similar comparison with the counties in the UK. That sounds like a project for me. 🙂
    Best wishes, Pete.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Sha'Tara says:

    Par for the course in a totally compromised, politically corrupt system.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Interesting data, Frank. Thanks for sharing.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Elizabeth says:

    I am mindful of the person yelling “keep the government out of my Medicare” at a political rally. Think how much more some of the states could get if they accepted the Medicaid they are offered. I have long known these facts, but it doesn’t make it any easier to listen to attacks on my very blue state.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.