Our New “Military” Police


Police Officer – 1950

Ferguson Police – so where’s the “threat”?   It’s YOU fool!

When did the change take place? Were we asleep or what?

When did Jack Webb become “Homeland”? Where are those nice cops we see on “Law and Order”? You know – the smart, articulate, ethical ones.

Remember when the people of the Boston metropolitan area were “requested” to stay in-doors while militarized infantry “police” went house to house in Watertown? The police had everything but artillery, hunting for a wounded 19 year old. I remember when cops carried a .38, a night stick and a badge.

Of course everyone did as they were “requested” and stayed indoors, figuring they might have a better chance of being shot by the police if they dared to go out rather than by the suspect. All in all it was nice practice for putting a populace under martial law.

When the wounded perp was finally located hiding in a boat under a tarp, the police fired literally hundreds of rounds in the dark (many of which entered nearby houses) mostly at each other. The two perps (one already deceased) had only one gun between them.

A follower of this blog has a son living in Watertown; she commented on how police came to his door searching for the perp, pointing an automatic rifle at him in front of his family and his dog. One would think the Gestapo was knocking rather than the Watertown Police Department.

Since 9/11 the Federal government has poured tens of billions of dollars into Homeland Security in addition to billions of dollars worth of unneeded military equipment parceled out to local police forces to meet “terrorist threats”. Is there a police department in America without a few armored transport vehicles, a stock pile of automatic weapons, kevlar, night vision goggles, camouflage uniforms, stocks of tear gas and masks? What are the desert camouflage uniforms for?  Trying to blend in?  Or standout?

In addition to the wide spread use of military / infantry equipment suitable for the battlefield, the tactics of an occupying army have been imported as well.  Security uber alles is now the driving force.

Glen Greenwald noted in his recent article on militarization: “The dangers of domestic militarization are both numerous and manifest. To begin with, as the nation is seeing in Ferguson, it degrades the mentality of police forces in virtually every negative way and subjects their targeted communities to rampant brutality and unaccountable abuse. The ACLU report summarized: “excessive militarism in policing, particularly through the use of paramilitary policing teams, escalates the risk of violence, threatens individual liberties, and unfairly impacts people of color.”

One gets the feeling that the Ferguson Police  believe they are sitting on top of a garbage can, “protecting” us!  I’m willing to bet very few of those officers actually live in Ferguson.

Greenwald further commented on the military presence in St. Paul during the GOP National Convention back in 2008 : “St. Paul was the most militarized I have ever seen an American city be, even more so than Manhattan in the week of 9/11 — with troops of federal, state and local law enforcement agents marching around with riot gear, machine guns, and tear gas canisters, shouting military chants and marching in military formations. Humvees and law enforcement officers with rifles were posted on various buildings and balconies. Numerous protesters and observers were tear gassed and injured.”

So what do we make of all this? After all, this is not Baghdad. And those nice cops on “Law and Order” do not exist – most are authoritarian types a la cop wannabe George Zimmerman, who is still legally walking around with a gun, apparently taking it upon himself to randomly guard neighborhood businesses at night lest there be a break-in.

Now just think what police could do today should there be another massive march on the Pentagon!  The “military” police are in place precisely to prevent such “disorder”.  Your constitutional right to peacefully assemble and protest exists only if you get a permit beforehand, carry your signs only where the authorities allow and go home and quietly put away your sign when you are told like good little boys and girls.

Especially if you’re a leftie.  The cops don’t shoot crazy ranchers out West who point guns at them – only brown people and “commies”.

Cops are there only to protect property – not your rights.  Those you have to protect yourself.



photo of Ferguson and Greenwald Article: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/08/14/militarization-u-s-police-dragged-light-horrors-ferguson/


About toritto

I was born during year four of the reign of Emperor Tiberius Claudius on the outskirts of the empire in Brooklyn. I married my high school sweetheart, the girl I took to the prom and we were together for forty years until her passing in 2004. We had four kids together and buried two together. I had a successful career in Corporate America (never got rich but made a living) and traveled the world. I am currently retired in the Tampa Bay metro area and live alone. One of my daughters is close by and one within a morning’s drive. They call their pops everyday. I try to write poetry (not very well), and about family. Occasionally I will try a historical piece relating to politics. :-)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Our New “Military” Police

  1. Ms. V says:

    Makes you kinda want to run out and buy a gun for your own “protection”. Going to hell in a handbasket, T.


    • toritto says:

      Hi V! Nice to see you! Remembering back, the civil rights movement was successful not only because of MLK but also for the likes of the Panthers and Malcolm. The right to bear arms is soooo sacrosanct – except when black communities decide to arm themselves! Best regards.


  2. Even the old police treated blacks (and women) pretty badly. This was clearly a factor in radicalizing me in my early 20s. The disrespectful way police treated me as a law abiding citizen minding my own business.


  3. Invictus says:

    Why the rampant militarization of police and the hyper-surveillance of all communications? Do our elites expect a meltdown? http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/jun/14/climate-change-energy-shocks-nsa-prism


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.